top of page
Search

Beyond Soros: The Hidden Network of Global Money Steering U.S. Policy


Laptop with a financial chart displaying an upward arrow. Dollar bills fan out in front. World map silhouette in the background.

In the American political arena, the name “George Soros” has become shorthand for foreign influence. His name trends frequently on social media and is often invoked in political debates. While Soros is undeniably influential, focusing exclusively on him is both misleading and lazy. A deeper look reveals a sprawling international and domestic network of billionaires, foundations, and nonprofit organizations that together exert extraordinary influence over U.S. policy, public discourse, and even elections—often behind the scenes and with little public accountability.


The Problem with the “Blame Soros” Narrative

Criticizing Soros alone ignores the systemic infrastructure of influence that reaches far beyond a single figure. It absolves other actors of scrutiny and creates the illusion that if one individual were removed from politics, America would somehow be free from foreign or ideological manipulation. In reality, multiple billionaires—both foreign and domestic—are using non-governmental organizations (NGOs), tax-exempt funds, and media acquisitions to reshape American politics.


Hansjörg Wyss: The Swiss Shadow Financier

One of the most concerning figures flying under the radar is Hansjörg Wyss, a Swiss billionaire and former medical device executive. Wyss has no U.S. citizenship, yet he is a powerful player in progressive politics through his Wyss Foundation and donations to the New Venture Fund, a project of the Arabella Advisors network.

“Foreign nationals are prohibited from directly or indirectly contributing to political campaigns,” writes RealClearPolitics in an investigation into Wyss’s influence. However, Wyss’s foundation has funneled over $135 million into Arabella-managed nonprofits (Brooks). These funds are then redistributed to various causes, including environmental policy advocacy and progressive voter turnout campaigns—all shielded under the guise of philanthropy.

Tom Steyer and the Billionaire Climate Machine

Numerous smartphone icons displaying various social media and app logos on a blue grid, creating a digital network pattern.

American billionaire Tom Steyer is more well-known than Wyss, but his influence still escapes full scrutiny. Through NextGen America, Steyer has funded aggressive youth voter turnout operations, climate litigation strategies, and anti-Trump impeachment drives. Although he operates legally, his PACs, media buys, and NGO donations amount to a climate-focused political machine (Kertscher). Unlike Soros, Steyer rarely attracts criticism, despite spending hundreds of millions on campaigns and ballot initiatives.


Arabella Advisors and the Empire of Anonymous Influence

Perhaps the most significant node in this influence web is Arabella Advisors, a consulting firm managing billions of dollars across several “dark money” entities, including the Sixteen Thirty Fund, Hopewell Fund, and New Venture Fund. As Politico reported, these organizations host and fiscally sponsor hundreds of progressive-leaning projects while shielding donors from public disclosure (Schneider).


This structure allows individuals—like Wyss—to indirectly fund political outcomes without triggering foreign donation laws. In 2020 alone, Arabella’s network spent over $1.2 billion, often on advocacy disguised as “public education” (Voght).


The Philanthro-Industrial Complex

Elite philanthropy is another key vehicle for influence. Laurene Powell Jobs, widow of Apple founder Steve Jobs, operates the Emerson Collective, which owns The Atlantic and funds education and immigration reforms. Meanwhile, Pierre Omidyar, eBay’s founder, funds The Intercept, Open Markets Institute, and several digital censorship “disinformation” groups—raising concerns over the privatization of media narratives (Gittelsohn).


All of these actors operate through 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) nonprofits, which legally protect donors from disclosure and taxation. The impact is that political influence is laundered through philanthropy, with foundations effectively functioning as political war rooms.


USAID: A Cautionary Example

Just this week, reports surfaced that two individuals pleaded guilty to defrauding USAID—a federal program designed to provide foreign aid but one long accused of manipulating foreign political outcomes. What’s now emerging is that USAID funds have also reached domestic NGOs involved in activism, media partnerships, and even protest coordination under humanitarian pretenses.


These revelations underscore a larger issue: government grants—especially those routed through Donor-Advised Funds (DAFs)—are nearly impossible to track publicly. As watchdog @DataRepublican recently exposed through an open-source financial map, federal dollars may have unknowingly supported organizations involved in the “NoKings” protests, further complicating public trust in these mechanisms.

Flowchart linking organizations with funds data. Red boxes indicate taxpayer funds, highlighting notable financial figures and connections.

Conclusion: It Was Never Just One Man

The temptation to scapegoat George Soros is understandable—he is a known quantity, highly visible, and controversial. But he is also a decoy. Focusing solely on him obscures a far more complex, opaque, and powerful network of influence stretching across oceans, foundations, and algorithmic newsfeeds.


If Americans want to seriously investigate foreign and elite influence in U.S. politics, they must look beyond the familiar faces. While Soros may be a symbol, he’s just one part of a much broader network—one that hides behind charitable causes, foundations, and tax-exempt loopholes to push policy, media, and public sentiment in a direction voters never asked for.


Works Cited

Comments

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

©2019 by WECU NEWS. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page