Yesterday, while the nation's attention was absorbed by pressing concerns like securing basic necessities and grappling with rising costs, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) quietly approved President Biden's expansive "digital equity" plan. While the notion of digital equity, aiming for fair access to digital technologies, may sound commendable, a closer look raises substantial concerns about the potential consequences of these sweeping mandates.
On the surface, digital equity seeks to ensure equal opportunities for all individuals in the digital realm, regardless of socioeconomic status, location, or other demographics. However, beneath this seemingly altruistic veneer lies a significant expansion of government power, particularly in the realm of online expression.
A chief concern is the enhanced authority granted to the Biden administration for potential censorship of political adversaries. By giving the government a more robust role in regulating every Internet Service Provider (ISP), the FCC's decision empowers the administration with unprecedented control over online content.
According to reports from Yahoo Finance, the repercussions of these rules extend far beyond the digital landscape, impacting communication providers and their clients, irrespective of their scale or scope. Strikingly, the very concept of "digital equity" seems to lack substantiated evidence, raising questions about the necessity of such far-reaching interventions.
Brendan Carr of the FCC has highlighted that the consequences of this order stretch beyond the telecommunications industry, affecting entities traditionally beyond the FCC's regulatory scope—landlords, construction crews, marketing agencies, banks, and even the government itself. This move grants the administrative state sweeping powers, providing the Federal Government with an expansive mandate to intricately manage nearly every facet of internet functionality.
Ted Cruz, is also trying to bring notice to this huge overreach of the government. Stating, "The idea these regulations will not impact rural deployment defies credulity: If practically every business decision is subject to potential liability, companies will inevitably shift resources that would have otherwise been spent on deployment and innovation to hiring more lawyers and asking the FCC ‘mother-may-I.’ Your Draft Order’s sweeping scope, ambiguous, open-ended guidance, extensive enforcement framework, and expansive claimed remedial authority, would prevent providers from making such decisions without risking endless complaints and potential liability untethered from the statute’s objectives.”
In essence, the FCC's recent decision, made amidst the myriad challenges faced by the American people, raises valid concerns about the potential overreach of government authority and the far-reaching implications it may have on the internet landscape. As the digital realm becomes increasingly integral to our lives, the need for vigilant scrutiny of government actions that impact this domain becomes ever more critical.
Do you think the Biden Administration has overreached on their authority to control the Internet? If so, how do you think this will impact everyday Americans?
If you like our articles, please hit the heart down below. If the article resonates with you please share. Also, please consider making a small donation to our cash app @WecuNews. A small donation goes a long way in the prevention of censorship of our small but growing news organization.