Google’s Confession: How the Thought Police Knew Their Censorship Was Wrong—And Did It Anyway
- Lynn Matthews
- Sep 23
- 3 min read

Listen up, fam—Google’s been caught red-handed, and it’s uglier than a TikTok filter crash. For years, we’ve been screaming Google’s the Thought Police, rigging what you see, hear, and think with their algorithms. Now, thanks to Rep. Jim Jordan and his House Judiciary Committee, we’ve got the receipts: Google knew their censorship was wrong, cozied up to Biden’s crew anyway, and only fessed up when the gavel came down. This ain’t just a glitch—it’s a deliberate plot to choke free speech, and it’s time to burn it down.
The Smoking Gun Drops
On September 23, 2025, Google sent a letter to Jordan’s committee that’s basically a white flag. They admitted Biden admin pressure to censor COVID and election content was “unacceptable and wrong” and promised to reinstate thousands of YouTube creators banned for “political speech.” Jordan’s X thread called it a “victory,” but warned Europe’s next with global censorship threats. Translation? They knew they were crossing lines—First Amendment lines, election-swaying lines—but did it anyway until Congress twisted their arm.
The Censorship Cartel Exposed
Jordan’s been on this like a bloodhound since 2022, when he started firing off letters to Google CEO Sundar Pichai demanding dirt on their “collusion” with Biden’s team. By 2023, he had subpoenas flying, unearthing the “YouTube Files”—internal docs showing White House honchos like Andy Slavitt leaning on YouTube to nuke “vaccine hesitancy” videos. One email even had YouTube begging for “feedback” on censorship policies before rolling them out—proof they baked in the bias, knowing it’d silence lawful voices. Jordan called it a “partisan arm of the woke speech police,” and he’s not wrong. They weren’t just following orders; they were willing partners.

Algorithms as Weapons
Here’s where it gets spicy. Google’s algorithms aren’t neutral—they’re coded to tilt the playing field. Jordan’s probes showed search results and YouTube’s recommendation engine were tweaked to bury conservative voices, like the Hunter Biden laptop story, while boosting left-leaning narratives. In 2024, he caught them red-handed again when Google’s autocomplete ghosted terms tied to the Trump assassination attempt—censoring by omission. And don’t sleep on their AI, Gemini, spitting out “woke” history rewrites, with Google execs fully aware it was skewing reality. Studies Jordan amplified say this kind of search bias can sway 20% of undecided voters without them even noticing. That’s not a bug; that’s election meddling.
They Knew It Was Wrong
The kicker? Google’s own people knew this was shady. Internal leaks show execs debating “safety” over neutrality, prioritizing Biden’s talking points over free discourse. When YouTube blocked the Trump-Rogan interview last October, Jordan demanded answers, and Google’s weak excuse about “policy” didn’t cut it. They knew silencing a presidential candidate’s voice pre-election was a power grab, but they rolled with it until Jordan’s subpoenas forced their hand. That 2025 letter? It’s not remorse—it’s damage control after getting caught.
Time to Fight Back
WecuMedia has been saying it forever: Google’s not your friend; it’s the Thought Police with a smiley logo. But here’s the good news—Jordan’s oversight proves we can fight back. His committee forced Google to admit fault and open the door for banned voices to return. So what’s next? Ditch Google for search engines like Brave or DuckDuckGo that don’t play gatekeeper. Demand Congress audit Big Tech’s algorithms—Jordan’s already pushing for it. And share this story, because sunlight’s the best disinfectant.
This ain’t just about politics—it’s about who controls your mind. Google thought they could play god, but Jordan’s receipts and our voices can tear that throne down. Let’s do this, fam. Drop your thoughts on X and Facebook, and let’s keep the heat on.





Comments