Nina Jankowicz EU Speech: Anti-American Antics and a Censorship Crusade Exposed

Nina Jankowicz EU Speech: Calling America an Autocracy

On April 22, 2025, Nina Jankowicz stood before the European Parliament and did the unthinkable: she branded America an autocracy, urging Europe to resist the Trump administration’s “tyranny.” Supposedly there to fight Russian disinformation, she instead unleashed an anti-American tirade that’s backfired spectacularly. WECUMedia’s peeling back the curtain on her hypocrisy, her censorship obsession, and a history littered with flops like the Hunter Biden laptop debacle. This wasn’t just a speech—it was a career-killing blunder that exposes the left’s true agenda.

Jankowitcz addresses European Parliment

From Disinformation “Czar” to EU Soapbox: Who Is Nina Jankowicz?

Nina Jankowicz isn’t new to controversy. As head of Biden’s Disinformation Governance Board in 2022, she was tasked with battling “misinformation” but got the boot when Americans smelled censorship. Dubbed the “Ministry of Truth” by critics like Sen. Josh Hawley, the board collapsed, and Jankowicz resigned amid harassment and death threats. She’s since styled herself a victim, but her record tells a different story.

A Trail of Missteps:

Jankowicz’s authored books like How to Lose the Information War and advised Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry, earning a spot on TIME’s AI influentials list. But her resume’s stained by errors: she backed debunked Trump-Russia claims in 2016, worked with StopFake (accused of whitewashing Ukrainian neo-Nazis), and tied herself to the UK’s Integrity Initiative, a shady anti-Russian propaganda network. This is no truth warrior—she’s a narrative pusher.

The “Autocracy” Lie: Smearing America on Foreign Soil

Jankowicz’s EU speech was supposed to tackle Russia’s troll farms and cyberattacks. Instead, she pivoted to a jaw-dropping claim: “Stand firm against another autocracy: The United States of America.” Her evidence? Zilch. She speculated about a Trump “pressure campaign” to gut the EU’s Digital Services Act, ditch Ukraine, and go soft on Russia, pointing to the Global Engagement Center’s closure as proof of democratic decay.

Reality Check: America’s no Autocracy.

Trump’s 2024 win was a democratic mandate, complete with checks, balances, and a free press. The GEC, shuttered by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, was criticized for funding groups that blacklisted conservative media—not exactly a democratic poster child. X users roasted her, with one quipping, “Nina calls the U.S. an autocracy while the EU ignores its own referendums."

Why It’s Baseless:

Her “pressure campaign” talk is pure fiction, unsupported by facts. Calling a democratic nation an autocracy in a foreign parliament isn’t just reckless—it’s a gift to conservatives, who branded her “treasonous.” As Daily Caller reported, her remarks risk fracturing U.S.-EU unity when Russia’s threats demand solidarity.

Censorship Queen: What’s Nina Really Fighting For?

Jankowicz’s EU plea wasn’t about democracy—it was a love letter to censorship. She championed the DSA, a law critics say lets EU bureaucrats police speech as “harmful.” She accused the U.S. of shielding tech giants, but her history shows she’s no free speech fan.

Censorship Track Record:

In 2022, she praised government-backed content moderation and slammed “free speech absolutists” like Elon Musk. Her Disinformation Board aimed to “coordinate” truth, but Americans saw it as a speech-squashing scheme. Her EU speech doubles down, pushing global regulation that could silence dissent while crying “democracy.” Hypocrisy, anyone?

Credibility in Ruins: The Laptop Fiasco and 51 Intel Pals

If Jankowicz wants to lecture on truth, she needs a reality check. Her past is a graveyard of credibility-killers, starting with the Hunter Biden laptop.

Laptop Debacle:

In 2020, she dismissed the laptop story as a “Trump campaign product” and Russian disinformation, echoing Biden’s debate line. When The Washington Post and others verified its authenticity, her error was undeniable. Yet in 2025, she defended the 51 intelligence officials who pushed the same baseless Russian narrative, calling their letter “free speech.” X users weren’t buying it: “She failed at disinformation—her one job!”

Pattern of Error:

From promoting debunked Trump-Russia claims (e.g., Alfa Bank) to ties with StopFake, accused of whitewashing neo-Nazis, Jankowicz picks narrative over facts. Her EU speech, leaning on this shaky foundation, was a sitting duck for critics.

A Colossal Misstep: Why Nina Should’ve Zipped It

Jankowicz’s speech was a masterclass in self-sabotage. Here’s why it was a disaster:

• Wrong Place, Wrong Time: A hearing on Russian threats wasn’t the venue to bash America. Her pivot distracted from Putin’s lies, weakening her anti-disinformation cred.

• Handing Ammo to Critics: By slamming the U.S. abroad, she gave conservatives a “disloyal” narrative. Twitchy and Revolver News pounced, and figures like Kurt Schlichter called her out. Her 2022 harassment nightmare should’ve taught her to tread lightly.

• Career Killer: This speech didn’t just flop—it made her a meme. Instead of rallying support, she alienated allies and revived her past failures. Silence would’ve kept her relevant; speaking made her a punchline.

Nina’s Antics Expose the Left’s True Face

Nina Jankowicz’s EU speech was more than a mere misstep—it unveiled deeper inconsistencies. By branding the United States an autocracy without substantial evidence and relying on a history marked by questionable claims, she revealed a focus on controlling narratives rather than championing truth. Her advocacy for censorship, cloaked as a defense of democracy, underscores an agenda that prioritizes control over free speech. Let’s call out these tactics and work toward a world where open dialogue and the free exchange of ideas thrive