Senate Committee Advances Map That Could Eliminate Louisiana’s Second Majority-Black District

Lawmakers move forward with a plan creating five Republican-leaning seats and one Democratic district centered on New Orleans, following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down the previous map.

Baton Rouge, La. — In a dramatic early-morning vote, the Louisiana Senate & Governmental Affairs Committee approved a new congressional map that would reshape the state’s political landscape ahead of the 2026 elections.

The committee passed Senate Bill 121 around 4:25 a.m. Wednesday, creating five Republican-leaning districts and a single Democratic seat anchored in New Orleans. The plan effectively eliminates the current 6th Congressional District, a majority-Black seat currently held by U.S. Rep. Cleo Fields.

The vote came just two weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on April 29 that Louisiana’s existing congressional map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. That ruling forced state lawmakers into a rushed redistricting process with a hard deadline of June 1, when the regular legislative session ends.

Heated Debate at the Capitol

Tuesday’s committee hearing was marked by sharp exchanges as lawmakers considered four competing map proposals. Civil rights advocate Gary Chambers clashed with senators during testimony, highlighting the deep divisions over how race should factor into district lines.

Proponents of the new map argue it reflects Louisiana’s current political reality — a state that has consistently voted Republican in recent statewide elections. They say the previous map artificially created a second majority-Black district in violation of the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Voting Rights Act

.

Opponents, including Democratic lawmakers and voting rights groups, warn that the map reduces Black voting power and could suppress minority representation in Congress. With Louisiana’s population roughly 33% Black, critics argue that packing most Democratic voters into one New Orleans-based district leaves the rest of the state with little competitive balance.

“This isn’t about fairness — it’s about power,” one Democratic senator said during floor debate. “We’re drawing lines that will determine who gets a voice in Washington for the next decade.”

What It Means for Baton Rouge, Louisiana

For residents in the Baton Rouge area, the proposed map could shift representation significantly. East Baton Rouge Parish, currently split across multiple districts, would likely see changes in which communities are grouped together.

The new configuration would likely place much of the capital region into Republican-leaning districts, reducing the influence of urban and minority voters who have historically supported Democratic candidates.

Local political observers say the stakes are high. With the 2026 midterm elections looming, the map approved by the Senate committee will now head to the full Senate, then the House, and finally to Gov. Jeff Landry for signature.

Tight Timeline and Legal Risks

Lawmakers are racing against the June 1 deadline. Any delay could force a special session or leave the state without new districts in time for candidate qualifying.

Legal challenges are already expected. Voting rights groups have signaled they are prepared to sue if the final map is signed into law, arguing it still violates federal protections.

Senate President Cameron Henry and other Republican leaders have defended the process, saying the committee followed proper procedures and considered multiple proposals before settling on the current plan.

What Happens Next

The full Senate is expected to take up the map in the coming days. If approved, it will move to the House, where further amendments are possible. Gov. Landry has indicated he will sign whatever map the Legislature sends him, provided it complies with the Supreme Court’s ruling.

For Baton Rouge voters, the coming weeks will determine not just who represents them in Congress, but how much influence the capital city will have in a deeply polarized national environment.

As one longtime political observer put it: “Redistricting isn’t just lines on a map — it’s about who gets heard and who gets ignored for the next ten years.”