top of page
Search

Trump’s Order to Defund NPR, PBS, and USAID Exposes Taxpayer-Funded Betrayal


A cracked piggy bank labeled "Taxpayer Dollars" with NPR/PBS and USAID pipes leaking coins and documents. Urban and rural backdrop.

President Donald Trump’s May 1, 2025, executive order to gut NPR and PBS funding ignites a firestorm, accusing them of peddling “divisive, urban-elite narratives” with taxpayer cash. Targeting the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), it endangers rural stations and Sesame Street. Supporters cheer a strike against media betrayal, while PBS CEO Paula Kerger calls it “unlawful” and an assault on journalism. With NPR pocketing $1.8 million from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, and USAID’s alleged 2019 Trump impeachment plot exposed, why should taxpayers fund agencies that serve elites over everyday Americans?

Statement by CPB on Executive Order affecting public media. Details CPB's independence from federal authority. Dated May 2, 2025.

Private Wealth, Public Betrayal: NPR, PBS, and USAID

NPR and PBS, propped up by CPB’s $535 million annual budget, claim to unite Americans. NPR takes 1% of its $342 million revenue from CPB, NPR stations 10%, PBS stations 15%. Yet, private donors like Open Society, dumping $1.8 million into NPR in 2023, flood their vaults. PBS’s $524 million revenue begs: Why leech off taxpayers?


The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), with a $40 billion budget, mirrors this overreach. Investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger alleges USAID fueled the 2019 Trump impeachment via the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), funded with $2.1 million in 2023. OCCRP’s report, cited four times in the CIA whistleblower’s complaint, tied Trump’s lawyer to Ukrainian probes of the Bidens, per a 2024 NDR documentary revealing USAID’s control over OCCRP’s hires and plans.


Shellenberger calls this “treasonous” domestic meddling, akin to NPR/PBS’s elite bias.

NPR and PBS tout “firewalls” like ombudsmen, but 60% of NPR’s 2024 investigative stories align with Open Society’s social justice bent (MRC 2024). USAID’s OCCRP ties raise similar red flags. When taxpayer-funded entities—media or aid—chase elite agendas, why should the public pay? Private wealth should cover their schemes, not our wallets.


Rural Neglect: Serving Elites, Not Heartland

NPR and PBS claim CPB funds sustain 170 rural stations serving 20 million with news and emergency alerts. Yet, 65% of NPR’s listeners and 60% of PBS’s viewers are urban (Pew 2024), and content caters to city tastes. Rural Americans crave economic or local focus, not PBS’s 2024 systemic racism series, which NPR’s ombudsman reported drew rural complaints for its urban slant. NPR’s 2024 election coverage, 70% obsessed with January 6 prosecutions (MRC 2024), ignored rural priorities like voter access.


USAID’s alleged impeachment stunt parallels this betrayal. If NPR and PBS pump urban agendas into rural stations, their emergency services excuse collapses. Local broadcasters, like Oklahoma’s radio networks, could handle alerts, or private donors could fund stations. Why burden taxpayers, already burned by USAID’s political games, to bankroll media that snubs the heartland? Both cases scream elite priorities over public good, demanding a rethink of federal funding.


Divisive Content: Puppets to Prehistoric Agendas (200 words)

NPR and PBS sow division, not unity. PBS’s Sesame Street ignited fury in 2018 when a writer told Queerty that Bert and Ernie were a gay couple. Sesame Workshop denied it, but a 2021 episode with two dads fueled Fox News reports of parental outrage over “progressive preaching.” Rural families, wanting apolitical kids’ shows, feel betrayed.

NPR’s 2023 Short Wave episode, “Queer Ecology,” probed same-sex behaviors in prehistoric animals. The Federalist slammed it as “niche activism,” citing ombudsman letters decrying its disconnect from rural concerns like jobs. A 2023 MRC study found that PBS gave Republicans 85% negative coverage, versus 54% positive coverage for Democrats. NPR’s 2024 January 6 focus (70% legal stories) skipped election integrity debates, alienating millions. This feeds a 78% Republican vs. 30% Democrat media distrust gap (Gallup 2024).


Like USAID’s alleged impeachment meddling, NPR and PBS prioritize elite narratives. If Sesame Street and “Queer Ecology” spurn taxpayers, and Open Society’s $1.8M backs such content, why fund division with public dollars? Both agencies betray the public trust they’re meant to uphold.


Legal Showdown: Who Owns the Purse?

Trump’s order faces legal fire. CPB, a private nonprofit, is guarded by a 47 U.S.C. statute and two-year funding, blocking executive control. CPB’s April 29, 2025, lawsuit over Trump’s board member firings signals defiance. A 2020 ruling against Trump’s funding freeze hints courts may halt the order.


Trump’s team claims authority over grantees, arguing taxpayers shouldn’t fund divisive media. A win could mirror USAID’s potential overhaul, reshaping funding. The clash tests whether one leader can stop public money from fueling elite schemes, especially when private donors already bankroll them.


Voices in the Divide

Charlie Kirk hails the order as a strike against “elite media,” echoing rural listeners who told NPR’s ombudsman their coverage ignores heartland needs. Rep. Scott Perry calls it a blow to “partisan spin.” NPR CEO Katherine Maher and Kerger defend 40 million listeners, claiming rural reach. Dan Goldman decries an attack on free speech. Yet, with Open Society’s $1.8M and USAID’s $2.1M to OCCRP fueling impeachment plots, critics ask: Whose voice? The debate mirrors USAID’s scrutiny, exposing taxpayer-funded betrayal of everyday Americans.

A Nation Fractured: Media’s Role

Trump’s order taps a crisis: 62% of Americans distrust media (Pew 2024). NPR and PBS, with 65% urban NPR listeners, worsen this. Their focus on January 6 or systemic racism over rural jobs fuels 78% Republican distrust (Gallup 2024). USAID’s alleged impeachment role betrays similar trust. Part of Trump’s $163 billion FY2026 budget cuts, the order could hit other entities. If NPR, PBS, and USAID serve elites, their public funding is indefensible, especially with private millions waiting.


Taxpayers vs. Elites

Trump’s order demands NPR, PBS, and USAID justify public funds. Courts may uphold CPB, but a win could end elite subsidies. With Open Society’s $1.8M and divisive content, why should taxpayers pay? This fight’s about America’s story—elites or us. Time to pull the plug.


Sources:

Comments

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

©2019 by WECU NEWS. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page