The Big Beautiful Bill: Stephen Miller Debunks Critics, But Questions Linger

Is the Big Beautiful Bill a Win for America or a Social Media-Fueled Mirage?

As Wecu Media nears our 1,000th article, we’re diving into the firestorm over the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” a 1,116-page behemoth blending tax cuts, spending slashes, and border security. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller took to X to slam “fantastically false claims” about the bill, but the outrage machine, fueled by X’s algorithm, as well as other social media's algorithms, is muddying the truth. With 940 articles under our belt, Wecu’s here to cut through the noise and unpack Miller’s defense, the bill’s fiscal reality, and why social media keeps amplifying the chaos.

Miller’s Case: Massive Cuts, Not Deficit Hikes

Miller, a key Trump aide, insists the bill delivers on 2024 campaign promises. He tackles three criticisms head-on. First, claims that it doesn’t codify Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts are “false” because Senate rules limit reconciliation bills to mandatory spending (e.g., Medicaid, Food Stamps), not discretionary areas (e.g., Department of Education) where DOGE operates. The bill still slashes $1.6 trillion in mandatory spending, including “the largest-ever welfare reform.” Second, Miller calls deficit-hike accusations a “lie” based on a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) “gimmick.”

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) rates, set to expire in September 2025, were meant to be permanent—maintaining them doesn’t add to the deficit, he argues. Finally, he debunks claims the bill “spends trillions,” clarifying it’s not a 10-year budget but a focused package funding only border and defense priorities while cutting $1.6 trillion net. 

Double Taxation Robs Seniors of Their Hard-Earned Retirement - One Big Beautiful Bill 

The Outrage Machine Amplifies the Fight

X is buzzing with reactions. Supporters like @csyrigos and @Marie4345190 echo Miller, praising the bill’s $1.6 trillion in cuts and border security boosts ($46.5B for Trump’s wall, $45B for ICE). Critics, including fiscal hawks like Rep. Chip Roy and Sen. Ron Johnson, warn it adds $3.1-$3.8 trillion to the deficit, per CBO and CRFB estimates, due to $4.1 trillion in tax cuts outpacing $1.6 trillion in savings. X’s algorithm, which favors divisive posts (92% of tweets from 10% of users), amplifies this clash. Accounts like @bennyjohnson (2.5M followers) thrive on outrage, drowning out nuanced takes like Wecu’s. Our non-verified account outpaced our Premium+ because authenticity resonates, but it’s a tough fight against X’s rage-bait machine.

The Truth Behind the Bill

Miller’s right that Senate rules limit DOGE cuts in reconciliation, and the $1.6 trillion in mandatory cuts is significant. But the CBO’s $3.8 trillion deficit estimate isn’t just a “gimmick”—it reflects real revenue losses from extending TCJA and new tax breaks (e.g., no taxes on tips). The bill’s $350 billion in new spending—$150B for defense, $46.5B for border walls—also raises eyebrows among deficit hawks. Wecu’s 940 articles show we value fiscal responsibility; this bill’s math, while bold, doesn’t fully square with Trump’s debt-cutting promises. X’s echo chamber, where @libsoftiktok’s rants get 800K views, obscures this debate with noise.

Wecu’s 1,000th Article: Exposing X’s and Social Media's Role

As we near 1,000 articles, Wecu’s digging deeper. Our upcoming exposé will unmask how X’s algorithm buries truth under outrage, using this bill as a case study. Join us in breaking the cycle—share this article and follow #Wecu1000 to fight for clarity in 2025’s culture wars.