Compounded Lies - It's Not Science
Military Governments discovered by Project Veritas prove that testimony given by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of National Institute for Allergy and Infectious disease NIAID under oath were fraudulent.
From Project Veritas:
[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022] Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.
The story begins like this. in 2018, Eco-Health Alliance approached the Department of Defense for funding on a project Titled DEFUSE (Defusing the Threat of Bat-Borne Coronaviruses) EHA was requesting US$14,209,245 with approximately $1,182M going to Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
While the grant reached DARPA the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications, DARPA declined the grant proposal based on the moratorium on "gain of function" research as well as safety concerns.
Among other reasons for not wanting to fund the Eco-Health Alliance project were,
The proposed DEFUSE project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk by failing to consider the following issues:
- Gain of Function
- Dual Use Research of Concern
- Vaccine epitope coverage
- Regulatory requirements
- ELSI (ethical, legal, and social issues) - Data Usage
September 2021, the Intercept released 900 pages of documents detailing the use of Government funds from NIAID to Eco-Health Alliance. It is mentioned here because, in addition to the documents released by the intercept, the documents described below are additional incriminating evidence uncovered by Project Veritas.
The subject is titled: Sars-CoV-2 Origins Investigation with US Government Program Undisclosed Document Analysis page 2 of 24.
Veritas discovered where and what Covid is.
Sars CoV-2 is an American created recombinate bat vaccine, or a precursor virus. It was created by Eco-Health program at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, (WIV), as suggested by the reporting surrounding the lab leak hypothesis. The details of this program have been concealed since the pandemic began. These details can be found in the Eco-Health alliance proposal response to the DARPA PREEMPT program BROAD AGENCY ANOUNCEMENT (BAA) HR00118S0017, dated March 2018 a document not yet publicly disclosed.
The contents of the proposed program are extremely detailed. Peter Daszak lays out step by step what the organization intends to do by phase and by location. The primary scientists involved, their roles, and their institutions are indicated. The funding plan for the WIV work is its own document. The reasons why non pharmaceutical interventions like masks and medical counter-measures like Mrna vaccine do not work well can be extrapolated from the details. The reasons why the early treatment protocols work as curatives are apparent.
SARS-CoV-2's form as it emerged is likely as a precursor, deliberately virulent, humanized recombinant SARSr-CoV was to be reverse engineered into a live attenuated SARSr-CoV bat vaccine. It's nature can be determined from analysis of its genome with the context provided by the Eco-Health Alliance proposal. Joining this analysis with US Intelligence collections on Wuhan will aid this determination.
From Page 4, despite what the government and media are telling the masses the Project Veritas Document uncovered evidence that early treatment protocols were being suppressed.
Because of its (now) know nature, the SARSr-C0V-WIV's illness is readily resolved with early treatment that inhibits the viral replication that spreads the spike protein around the body (which induce a harmful over active immune response which the body tries to clear the spikes from the ACE2 receptors). Many of the early treatment protocols ignored by the authorities work because they inhibit viral replication or modulate the immune response to the spike proteins, which makes sense within the context of what Eco-Health was creating. Some of these treatment protocols also inhibit the action of the engineered spike protein. For instance, Ivermectin (identified as curative in April 2020) works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response. Of note, Chloroquine Phosphate (Hydroxychloriquine, identified April 2020 as curative) is identified in the proposal as SARSr-CoV inhibitor, as interferon (identified May 2020 as curative).
The gene-encoded, or "mRNA," vaccines work poorly because they are synthetic replication of the already synthetic SARS-CoV-WIV spike proteins and poses no other epitopes.
Specifically, stated, the mRNA vaccine is inefficient as has been proven several times in its waning efficiency because it does not account for the variants of the vaccine. Also, it has been known for some time that both HCQ and Ivermectin are specifically stated as curative measures to combat this virus.
The American public would like to know why this type of research was funded if it lead to the deaths of millions worldwide, and also why early treatments were being suppressed. From the Veritas documents, one could conclude that taking the "curative" treatments would interfere with the vaccine and its efficacy. However, this would have to be studied further to see if these "curative" agents would inhibit vaccine efficacy.
While Dr. Fauci denied any involvement in Gain of Function research being done by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, testimony today in Congress Rand Paul points out that the definition of Gain of function was changed around the time the virus emerged.